Sex dating in wisdom montana
DOJ/OCR rules require the University of Montana (and, in effect, all colleges and universities) to establish quasi-judicial procedures for hearing harassment complaints that favor complainants: Students accused of harassment are to be convicted in the absence of clear and convincing evidence of guilt, if guilt merely seems more likely than not, under a permissive "preponderance of evidence" standard.(This controversial, low standard of proof requirement was announced in 2011.) Accused students may even be punished before any finding of guilt; as former OCR official Hans Bader observes, this is potentially an Alice in Wonderland "sentence first, verdict after" system: The DOJ/OCR letter states, "a university must take immediate steps to protect the complainant from further harassment prior to the completion of the Title IX and Title IV investigation/resolution.FIRE is right to note that fair, inclusive enforcement of this mindlessly broad policy is impossible. I doubt federal officials want or expect it to be used against sex educators, advocates of reproductive choice, anti-porn feminists, or gay rights advocates, if their speech of a sexual nature is "unwelcome" by religious conservatives.
Montana has agreed to hire an "equity consultant," and conduct student focus groups, annual "climate surveys" and monitoring programs; it will also subject itself to an annual federal assessment "of the effectiveness of its anti-discrimination efforts." Who will benefit from this system?
Not educators who hope to foster critical thinking, not students seeking intellectual instead of bureaucratic experiences, not parents whose tuition dollars support unwieldy student life bureaucracies, and not those administrators who value academic freedom and the university's traditional educational mission.
Appropriate steps may include separating the accused harasser and the complainant, providing counseling for the complainant and/or harasser, and/or taking disciplinary action against the harasser." Finally, in addition to punishing alleged harassers, colleges and universities are required to undertake extensive, putatively preventative measures against harassment, mainly extensive mandatory training (or re-education) programs for staff members and students.
Read the dreary, detailed resolution agreement between the Obama administration and the University of Montana to appreciate the burdensome sexual harassment bureaucracies required by federal policy, especially when a school has been found derelict.
When people demand censorship of "unwelcome" speech, they're usually demanding censorship of the speech that they find unwelcome.
They usually seek to silence their political or ideological opponents, not their friends—all in the name of some greater good.After teaching as a wilderness survival instructor for many years, I moved into wilderness therapy working with troubled teens with severe behaviors.Eventually, my passion for therapy led me to the highly effective methods of Clinical Hypnotherapy.The Obama administration's bureaucratic dream is an educational nightmare. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley and Richard H. The trouble is, officials have focused on stemming insults as well as assaults.Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating